Agenda:
Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022
.png)
India stands at a pivotal moment where the modernization of criminal investigations intersects with the protection of fundamental rights. The Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022 expands the scope of collecting biometric and biological data, presenting both promise and concern. Enhanced identification measures could strengthen forensic capabilities, improve conviction rates, and aid law enforcement in addressing emerging security challenges. However, the breadth of data collection, prolonged retention periods, and inclusion of individuals not convicted of offences raise questions about privacy, due process, and potential misuse. The implementation of such powers could influence public trust in institutions, redefine the balance between state authority and individual liberty, and shape the contours of surveillance in a democratic society. Transparency, accountability, and clearly defined safeguards will be essential to ensure that investigative efficiency does not come at the cost of civil liberties. As parliamentarians, you are called to deliberate: will these expanded identification powers strengthen the justice system, or risk creating a framework vulnerable to misuse?
Dikshit Laddha
Speaker, Lok Sabha
I, Dikshit Laddha, am honored to serve as the Speaker of the Lok Sabha and look forward to embracing this responsibility with dedication and integrity. I am a 12th grader who is an avid MUNer, Quizzer, and entrepreneur driven by an insatiable curiosity, particularly toward Indian politics, economics, and entrepreneurship, always eager to explore new ideas and perspectives. I am looking forward to making this an enriching experience for you all.
This year, the Lok Sabha turns its focus to a matter with far-reaching legal and constitutional implications—the scope and implementation of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022, and its impact on privacy, due process, and civil liberties. While there is broad agreement on the need to modernize criminal investigations through scientific identification techniques, consensus on safeguards remains elusive. The legislation raises difficult questions: Should biometric data be collected from individuals not yet convicted? What limits must govern storage, access, and retention of sensitive personal information? And how can Parliament ensure that expanded investigative powers strengthen law enforcement without creating a framework vulnerable to misuse or excessive state surveillance?
As lawmakers, it falls upon us to ensure that expanded identification powers strengthen justice without compromising fundamental freedoms. Your responsibility, as parliamentarians of the world’s largest democracy, is to create a framework that upholds privacy, prevents misuse, and reinforces public trust while enabling effective law enforcement.